tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8986375963954453859.post8690824248318614764..comments2024-03-25T14:16:16.893-05:00Comments on Irate, Tireless Minority: Not Allowed?Call Me Momhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17420259973871484926noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8986375963954453859.post-9116531261783752552008-05-17T18:14:00.000-05:002008-05-17T18:14:00.000-05:00You wrote:"It seems unreasonable to make a big dea...You wrote:<BR/><BR/>"It seems unreasonable to make a big deal out of it when there are so many more relevant and substantive reasons not to vote for him."<BR/><BR/>Well said. Once I was in a discussion with a friend concerning corporal punishment in which I used the term "capital punishment" instead of corporal punishment. My friend laughingly replied: "I think you mean corporal punishment don't you?" To which I replied: "uh, well, let's hope so!" LOL<BR/><BR/>I agree, of course. There are plenty of good reasons not to vote for Mr. Obama without trying to make a simple slip of the tongue into one. In fact, that slip of the tongue is probably one of the most appealing thing I've ever read about Obama. At least I now know he's not a god. ;-)Terry Morrishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00166609562028309038noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8986375963954453859.post-35958307853253864592008-05-17T16:21:00.000-05:002008-05-17T16:21:00.000-05:00It seemed to me that it was just a slip on his par...It seemed to me that it was just a slip on his part. It seems unreasonable to make a big deal out of it when there are so many more relevant and substantive reasons not to vote for him.Call Me Momhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17420259973871484926noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8986375963954453859.post-47499042507308076162008-05-17T15:25:00.000-05:002008-05-17T15:25:00.000-05:00Mom,Having only just now read the actual Obama quo...Mom,<BR/><BR/>Having only just now read the actual Obama quote for the first time, it appears to me that he meant to say 47 instead of 57; or, he's visited every state in the continental United States (or the lower forty eight) minus one. Which is precisely the reason I didn't pay any mind to it the first time I heard about the 57 states comment.<BR/><BR/>As far as the other thing goes, I suppose you're right. He probably should have said something more along the lines of "We determined (or I determined) that Alaska and Hawaii were out of the question because of blah blah blah."<BR/><BR/>Personally I just think the man is unfit and unqualified to be president. And that should be enough for anyone with common morals and average intelligence. Even if they do think that he actually believes there are more than fifty states. But anyway...<BR/><BR/>-TerryTerry Morrishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00166609562028309038noreply@blogger.com