Sunday, August 16, 2015

Friday, August 7, 2015

Saturday, August 1, 2015

Planned Parenthood or Planned Infanticide for Profit?

After the release of the videos showing the director of Planned Parenthood discussing the sale of body parts as though she were piecing out a discarded automobile, this author has been attempting to find the words to express the absolute horror with which she was afflicted in the watching. 

People are not animals. People are not objects. People are not disposable and people are certainly NOT to be dissected and sold in pieces to the highest bidder. Planned Parenthood is not alone in this perfidy. They are accompanied by those who are making the purchases. 

Is it not horrific enough that in this nation babies are being murdered by the millions since Roe v Wade? Must that horror be compounded by such a heartless, nay soulless traffic in their parts and pieces? 

For those who say that these aborted children are not human beings - you are wrong. The moment the egg and the sperm combine, when the child's unique DNA code is formed - at that moment, you have a new human being. If this first cell were found at a crime scene and analyzed to determine the identity of the person to whom that DNA belonged - it would not belong to either parent, but to the child alone. This newly formed human being can be allowed to grow and come to term without ever having spent a single second in the womb of the biological mother as we have seen by the children born from adopted embryos. This is a human being and more- it is the most helpless of human beings. The most dependent upon those of us who have already been born to protect it. 

Because the depth of the depravity in this situation is so great, I can only address it by stating that these children are human beings and posting something we seem to have forgotten - despite the vows of that generation. 

THE NUREMBERG CODE 

1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment. The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.

2. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature. 

3. The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment. 

4. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury. 

5. No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects. 

6. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment. 

7. Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death. 

8. The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment. 

9. During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible. 

10. During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill, and careful judgment required of him, that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.

"1 At the same time came the disciples unto Jesus, saying, Who is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven?

And Jesus called a little child unto him, and set him in the midst of them,
And said, Verily I say unto you, Except ye be converted, and become as little children, ye shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven.
Whosoever therefore shall humble himself as this little child, the same is greatest in the kingdom of heaven.
And whoso shall receive one such little child in my name receiveth me.
But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea." ~ Matthew 18:1-6