Sounds like a very professional meeting - aside from the appalling assumption that it is their job to "make decisions for the health of the public conversation". How arrogant does someone have to be to insist that they understand free speech even while they are censoring it - because they think they are the best arbiter of what constitutes "the health of the public conversation"? Absolutely appalling and they don't even see what they are doing.
No comments:
Post a Comment
"Ground Rules
I welcome polite comments. I will delete profanity or personal attacks or anything I regard as a personal attack, so please bear that in mind if you choose to comment."
The comments section is returning to an unmoderated format. Please remember that I value manners and civility I am trusting that those who wish to comment are mature enough to value good manners and civility as well. If not, I will simply turn on the moderation again..