Friday, February 20, 2009

Wisconsin's 10th Amendment Resolution

Senator Liebham has kindly provided me with the text of his proposed resolution regarding the 10th amendment for Wisconsin and his aid, Mr. Werwie has assured me that I may publish it here. Without further ado, here is the text of the resolution.

2009 − 2010 Legislature SRM:wlj:phLRB−0927/1
"2009 − 2010 LEGISLATURE2009 SENATE JOINT RESOLUTION

Relating to: state sovereignty.

Whereas, the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States reads,“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people”; and

Whereas, the Tenth Amendment defines the total scope of federal power as being that specifically granted by the U.S. Constitution and no more; and

Whereas, as the scope of power is defined by the Tenth Amendment, the federal government was created by the states specifically to be an agent of the states; and

Whereas, today the states are demonstrably treated as agents of the federal government; and

Whereas, the legislature has forwarded to the federal government numerous resolutions opposing federal encroachment on state powers but has received no response or result from Congress or the federal government; and

Whereas, many federal mandates are directly in violation of the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States; and

Whereas, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled in New York v. United States, 112S. Ct. 2408 (1992) that Congress may not simply commandeer the legislative and regulatory processes of the states; and

Whereas, a number of federal proposals from previous administrations and some now pending from the present administration and from Congress may further violate the U.S. Constitution; now, therefore, be it

Resolved by the senate, the assembly concurring, That the state of Wisconsin hereby claims sovereignty under the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States over all powers not otherwise enumerated and granted to the federal government by the U.S. Constitution; and, be it further

Resolved, That adoption of this resolution does not constitute an application by the legislature of the state of Wisconsin for the calling of a federal Constitutional Convention within the meaning of Article V of the U.S. Constitution; and, be it further

Resolved, That this resolution shall serve as notice and demand to the federal government, as our agent, to cease and desist, effective immediately, mandates that are beyond the scope of its constitutionally delegated powers; and, be it further

Resolved, That the senate chief clerk shall provide copies of this joint resolution to the president of the United States, to the speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives, to the presiding officer of each house of each state legislature of the United States, and to each member of this state’s congressional delegation.(END)" (Emphasis in bold is mine)

"Then said the LORD unto Moses, Behold, I will rain bread from heaven for you; and the people shall go out and gather a certain rate every day, that I may prove them, whether they will walk in my law, or no." ~Exodus 16:4

10 comments:

Dr.D said...

Looks pretty good, Mom. What chance do you think it has of being adopted?

I was dismayed to read in today's paper that Gov. Doyle is asking for same sex marriage to be approved for Wisconsin. This resolution and SSM, while dealing with different matters, come from totally different mind sets. If one is adopted, it seems unlikely that the other will be.

Call Me Mom said...

Actually, I think the chances are pretty close to zero. But that doesn't mean it shouldn't be brought up for a vote. At the very least it may cause some folks to wake up and start looking at what is being done.

On the other hand I would love to be surprised by the citizens of our fine state, should they decide to contact their legislators and demand that it be passed.

As for SSM, our state has voted to keep marriage between a man and a woman and I think Mr. Doyle may have spent too much time in Madison if he thinks he can defy the will of the voters with impunity in this regard.

Dr.D said...

Mom, your comment about Mr. Doyle reminds me of a quote, attributed to a previous governor of Wisconsin (I forget which one) that was something like, "Dane County, 1200 square miles surrounded by reality."

Call Me Mom said...

I have been know to refer to my hometown of Madison as "University land surrounded by la-la land"

Anonymous said...

Thank you for posting that 10th Amendment Resolution. It is time for the states to take back their rightful powers from the federal government.

Call Me Mom said...

Welcome to the blog Smukie.
I had a look at yours and I must say I was intrigued. I don't think I've ever met a dog eating, formerly vegan skydiving filmaker who teaches English in a foriegn nation. Way to get the most out of life.

It'll be interesting to see what happens with this resolution and the others. I heard Oklahoma passed theirs. I'll update as I become informed.

Jules said...

I stumbled upon your blog today and was so pleasantly surprised with this entry. I live in NW WI and when I heard about the other states working on 10th Amendment legislation I contacted my Rep and Senator. I finally got a response from my Rep just yesterday in which she stated that "Our state legislature has good communication with our federal delegation and legislation that threatens to secede from the Union may be counterproductive." Never mind that I had made it clear that secession was not on my agenda either.

I am so glad to see that at least one of our WI Senators has the guts to tackle this issue. Thank you for posting this.

Call Me Mom said...

Jules,
Welcome to the blog. If you check a bit farther down you will see that my Rep had the idea under consideration too.
I think you would be safe in interpreting your Rep's statement:"Our state legislature has good communication with our federal delegation and legislation that threatens to secede from the Union may be counterproductive." as saying, "We have just gotten a handout from the federal government and we're afraid to cut off the money supply as that would cause us to actually have to do our jobs and make hard and unpopular decisions."

Calling the federal government to restrict themselves to their Constitutionally outlined duties is hardly the same thing as calling for secession. New Hampshire's resolution, now, that is a threat of secession. Ours is nothing more than a mild reproof.

Dr.D said...

Anonymous Troll said...

Who knows where to download XRumer 5.0 Palladium?

Troll, posting this same message all over the internet is not likely to get you a favorable response, but it will certainly make you lots of enemies. Can't you think of a better way to get help?

Call Me Mom said...

Thanks Dr.D.
I have removed the comment. Why put it on such an old post too? I can only hypothesize that he gets paid for the number of sites upon which he/she posts. What a waste of the time the Lord grants us.