Sounds like a very professional meeting - aside from the appalling assumption that it is their job to "make decisions for the health of the public conversation". How arrogant does someone have to be to insist that they understand free speech even while they are censoring it - because they think they are the best arbiter of what constitutes "the health of the public conversation"? Absolutely appalling and they don't even see what they are doing.
Tuesday, April 26, 2022
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment