Here is a question nobody - or almost nobody seems to be asking: Who voted for Kamala Harris in the presidential primaries? Because it looks like she was just "assigned" to replace the candidate for whom the voters had actually cast their votes. (And "Assigned by whom and by what authority?" is a question very few are asking too.)
Are democrat voters really okay with that? Is that a precedent that they want to set? After observing what was done to Bernie Sanders when he ran against Ms rodham-clinton, clearly there are bad actors in the people running the DNC, but this? This is outrageous.
Is this going to be the model from now on? The party doesn't like who the people voted for so they pressure that candidate to drop out and put in whomever the party chooses? That's appalling. What's next? Paying someone to run and drop out when the party wants them to so they can force someone else on the gullible fools who still think their vote matters?
And don't pretend that 'it is only this once, because ... insert reason here'. If such a subterfuge works once and is allowed, why wouldn't they use it going forward? Why wouldn't both parties? The fact that not even the so called conservative channels are pointing this out is equally appalling.
How stands the republic, my fellow Americans? This is our watch.
"10 And Delilah said unto Samson, Behold, thou hast mocked me, and told me lies: now tell me, I pray thee, wherewith thou mightest be bound." ~ Judges 16
No comments:
Post a Comment